Humphreys 2025 2 Sacr 1 Scandal , Humphreys 2025 2 Sacr 1 Scandal. (a) in humphreys 2013 (2) sacr 1 (sca), the court held that dolus eventualis was present because x ought to have foreseen or must have foreseen the possibility of the consequence. 2015 (1) sa 491 (sca) (22 march 2013) s v maselani and another (511/2012) [2013] zasca 21; S through an active railway crossing despite the warning of the arrival of a nearby oncoming train. Humphreys v s (424/2012) [2013] zasca 20; Humphreys 2025 2 Sacr 1 Scandal Images References : 2025
Humphreys 2025 2 Sacr 1 Scandal. (a) in humphreys 2013 (2) sacr 1 (sca), the court held that dolus eventualis was present because x ought to have foreseen or must have foreseen the possibility of the consequence. 2015 (1) sa 491 (sca) (22 march 2013) s v maselani and another (511/2012) [2013] zasca 21; S through an active railway crossing despite the warning of the arrival of a nearby oncoming train. Humphreys v s (424/2012) [2013] zasca 20;